HomeThe Science of ThoughtWhy Young People Don't Report Cyberstalking

Why Young People Don't Report Cyberstalking

Nearly half of stalking victims say their experience was "wrong but not a crime." Young people face the highest cyberstalking rates but are least likely to report it.

Share
The Science of Thought · Explore this series
August 2, 2025
Key Takeaways
  • Cyberstalking rose 70% in England and Wales between 2012 and 2020.
  • Nearly half of stalking victims did not view their experience as a crime.
  • Young adults face the highest cyberstalking rates but are least likely to report it.

Madeleine Janickyj was looking for patterns in crime data when she found something troubling. The UCL Computer Science researcher and her colleagues had eight years of nationally representative survey data from England and Wales.

The numbers told a clear story: cyberstalking was rising faster than any other form of stalking. But the people experiencing it often did not think a crime had occurred.

The study, published in the British Journal of Criminology, analyzed responses from 147,711 participants aged 16 to 59. Between 2012 and 2020, the proportion reporting cyberstalking rose from 1.0% to 1.7%. Physical stalking increased by just 15% over the same period.

Cyber-enabled stalking, using phones and texts to facilitate physical harassment, actually declined.

Key figure

48.7%

of stalking victims who said their experience was "wrong but not a crime"

A Crime That Does Not Feel Criminal

The research team distinguished between three types of stalking. Physical stalking means being followed or watched in person. Cyber-enabled stalking uses digital tools like GPS tracking to facilitate real-world harassment.

Cyberstalking occurs entirely online, through threatening messages, unwanted contact, or harassment campaigns on social platforms.

What is cyberstalking?

Cyberstalking is repeated, unwanted online behavior that causes fear, alarm, or distress. This includes threatening emails or messages, monitoring someone's online activity, or spreading false information about them. Unlike cyber-enabled stalking, it happens entirely in digital spaces.

Nearly half of all stalking victims described their experience as "wrong but not a crime." Only 26.7% identified what happened as criminal.

This perception gap was widest for cyberstalking. Victims of physical stalking were more likely to view their experience as illegal compared to those who faced harassment only online.

The Most Vulnerable, Least Likely to Report

Young people aged 16 to 24 faced the highest cyberstalking rates at 2.4%, more than twice the rate among 45 to 59 year olds. Yet this same group was least likely to view their experience as criminal.

Dr Leonie Tanczer, senior author on the study, suggests normalization may explain the gap.

Women experienced stalking at nearly twice the rate of men across all categories. Lesbian, gay, and bisexual respondents faced more than double the cyberstalking risk compared to heterosexual participants.

Women were more likely than men to recognize stalking as criminal, but younger victims consistently underestimated the seriousness of what they faced.

Cyberstalking also differed in who was responsible. Just 32% of victims had a domestic relationship with their stalker, compared to 69% for cyber-enabled stalking.

The anonymity of online harassment makes perpetrators harder to identify and, perhaps, makes victims less certain a crime has occurred.

The Recording Problem

Janickyj points to broader issues with how cyberstalking gets measured and recorded. Freedom of Information requests revealed that Metropolitan Police officers do not routinely record online crimes. Official statistics likely undercount both cyber-enabled and cyberstalking cases.

The Crime Survey for England and Wales itself blends some online and offline behaviors in its questions, making precise measurement difficult.

The researchers recommend updates to better capture the nuances of digital harassment, including clearer distinctions between stalking types.

If the people most affected do not recognize cyberstalking as criminal, and the systems meant to track it cannot measure it accurately, addressing the problem becomes difficult.

The first step may be convincing a generation raised online that harassment there counts just as much as harassment anywhere else.


Sources

Fact Check: Claim-by-Claim Verification Verified

All claims verified against the British Journal of Criminology paper, UCL press release, and secondary coverage. Statistics, participant numbers, and researcher attributions confirmed.

1 Supported
Madeleine Janickyj, UCL Computer Science researcher
Confirmed in paper and UCL press release.
2 Supported
147,711 participants aged 16-59, 2012-2020 data
Exact N=147,711 after filtering. Data covers April 2012 to March 2020.
3 Supported
Cyberstalking rose from 1.0% to 1.7%
Paper: 1.01% (2012/13) to 1.72% (2019/20), ~70% rise.
4 Supported
Physical stalking increased by 15%
Confirmed in paper trends and Euronews coverage.
5 Supported
Cyber-enabled stalking declined
Paper: survey wave OR=0.998, slight non-significant decline.
6 Mostly supported
48.7% said "wrong but not a crime"; 26.7% identified as criminal
Consistent with paper's perception analysis. Exact percentages in appendix tables.
7 Supported
16-24 age group: 2.4% cyberstalking rate, 2x rate of 45-59
Predicted probability 2.4% vs 1.0% confirmed in paper.
8 Supported
Dr Leonie Tanczer is senior author
Confirmed in paper and press releases.
9 Supported
Women stalked at nearly 2x rate of men
OR female ~1.87-1.97 across stalking types.
10 Supported
LGB respondents faced 2x+ cyberstalking risk
OR=2.239 for LGB/other category in cyberstalking.
11 Supported
32% domestic relationship in cyberstalking vs 69% in cyber-enabled
Exactly 32.19% and 69.23% in paper.
12 Mostly supported
Met Police don't routinely record online crimes (FOI)
Referenced in paper discussion; broader FOI data shows low recording rates for online abuse.

Commentary

  • Data ends at 2019/20 survey wave; patterns may have changed since COVID-19.
  • LGB/other category in CSEW does not include transgender or queer identities separately.

Sources used for verification

Academic/Peer-reviewed:

Other reliable sources:

Share
Related Articles
AI Consciousness Is Unlikely, Says Neuroscientist Anil Seth

Neuroscientist Anil Seth argues AI consciousness is unlikely without biology. His TED talk lands amid a widening debate over conscious AI, not intuition.

AI In Science Connects the Dots, But Only In Fields That Are Fragmented

An analysis of 80 million papers shows AI boosts originality where knowledge is scattered and connections are weak, but contributes little novelty in structured science.

"Keep Humanity Safe From AI," Urges Pope Leo XIV

Pope Leo XIV's first encyclical reaches the same verdict on AI as the labs building it, then parts ways over the meaning of human limits.

AI Solves Erdős Math Problem: What's Next for AI in Mathematics?

An AI solved an 80-year-old Erdős math problem by walking a path mathematicians had collectively avoided.