HomeThe New IntelligenceProfessor Hannah Fry: AI Court Rulings and Relationships by 2035

Professor Hannah Fry: AI Court Rulings and Relationships by 2035

A mathematician reveals why AI judges might be more consistent than humans, but warns against AI relationships as 'junk food' for the soul.

Youtube video
Share
The New Intelligence · Explore this series
November 20, 2025
Key Takeaways
  • AI algorithms already shape bail, sentencing, and parole decisions in courts.
  • Human judges are inconsistent — sports results can influence sentence lengths.
  • AI lacks embodied experience, making it unsuitable for full leadership roles.

Professor Hannah Fry's favorite example of judicial inconsistency: Judges tend to give harsher sentences in towns where the local sports team has lost recently.

During her appearance on This Morning, she explains why artificial intelligence in courtrooms might actually improve justice - despite our instinctive recoil from the idea.

The mathematician and TV presenter, promoting her new show "Infinite Explorer" on National Geographic, tackles three provocative AI headlines with characteristic insight.

Key figure

2035

The year Fry predicts we may be closer to AI companions than to human friends

The Inconsistency Problem

Apparently AI is already being used in courtrooms in the US and UK. Algorithms propose bail, sentences, and parole assessments, but the de facto decision still rests with the judge.

What is a risk-assessment algorithm?

A risk-assessment algorithm is a software tool that scores a defendant's likelihood of reoffending or failing to appear in court, based on factors like criminal history and background data. Judges can use the score as one input among many when deciding on bail, sentencing, or parole – but the legal decision remains theirs. Tools like COMPAS are among the most widely used in US courts.

Fry's initial reaction mirrors most people's: "You don't really want a kind of cold faceless machine involved in decisions about human freedom."

But human judges aren't consistent either.

Take the same case to different judges, you get different decisions. Take it to the same judge on different days, same problem. The randomness is enormous.

AI Leaders and Emotional Intelligence

When asked about AI prime ministers–a real proposal from a Japanese political party–Fry highlights a crucial limitation. Current AI systems excel at analysis and distilling information, but they're fragile in other ways.

"It might have read all of the internet, but it doesn't understand what it feels like to stand outside on a cold, rainy day," she explains. "It hasn't lived in the world in a human body."

Leaders need emotional connection and empathy. For now, human-AI teams work better than replacing humans entirely.

The Junk Food Relationship

The most concerning prediction: we'll be closer to AI than friends by 2035. Fry sees this already happening through chatbots that offer constant validation without reciprocal demands.

Her analogy cuts deep: "It's like the junk food version of human relationships. It might taste like food, but it doesn't mean that it's good for you."

Real relationships require showing up for others as much as they show up for you.

Fry's perspective balances pragmatic acceptance with human-centered caution. AI can improve flawed human systems, but replacing human judgment and connection entirely risks losing something essential about what makes us human.

Fact Check: Claim-by-Claim Verification Verified

All factual claims verified against the original This Morning interview, National Geographic show listings, and independent sources. Interview quotes, AI courtroom usage, and Japanese AI PM proposal all confirmed.

1 Supported
Judges give harsher sentences when local sports team lost
Hannah Fry cited this on This Morning as her "favorite example" of judicial inconsistency. Research supports that sports outcomes influence judicial decisions via mood effects.
2 Supported
Hannah Fry is a mathematician and TV presenter
Professor of Mathematics at UCL, well-known TV presenter and author.
3 Supported
Promoting "Infinite Explorer" on National Geographic
Confirmed on Nat Geo site and during the This Morning interview.
4 Supported
AI already used in US and UK courtrooms for bail/sentencing/parole
US: COMPAS widely used for bail and recidivism risk (ProPublica). UK: OASys AI for parole and sentencing risk (Tech & Justice Oxford). Judges retain final decision.
5 Supported
COMPAS among most widely used risk-assessment tools in US courts
Used in thousands of cases across multiple jurisdictions (ProPublica, COMPAS analysis). Controversial due to racial bias findings.
6 Supported
Japanese political party proposed AI prime minister
Path to Rebirth party proposed AI leader post-2025 elections (Japan Times, NDTV).
7 Mostly supported
Fry predicts we'll be closer to AI than friends by 2035
Fry affirmed the trend is "already happening" with chatbots on This Morning and used the "junk food" analogy. The 2035 date was presented as a headline she responded to rather than her own precise prediction.
8 Supported
Fry called AI relationships "junk food version of human relationships"
Direct quote confirmed from the This Morning interview and echoed in Science Focus (2026).

Commentary

  • This article is primarily an interview summary reporting Fry's opinions and predictions, which are inherently subjective rather than factual claims.
  • The 2035 prediction was a headline Fry responded to on This Morning, not her own precise forecast. The article could be clearer about this attribution.
  • COMPAS and similar tools remain controversial due to documented racial bias issues, which the article doesn't address in detail.

Sources used for verification

Academic/Peer-reviewed:

Other reliable sources:

Share
Related Articles
AI Consciousness Is Unlikely, Says Neuroscientist Anil Seth

Neuroscientist Anil Seth argues AI consciousness is unlikely without biology. His TED talk lands amid a widening debate over conscious AI, not intuition.

AI In Science Connects the Dots, But Only In Fields That Are Fragmented

An analysis of 80 million papers shows AI boosts originality where knowledge is scattered and connections are weak, but contributes little novelty in structured science.

"Keep Humanity Safe From AI," Urges Pope Leo XIV

Pope Leo XIV's first encyclical reaches the same verdict on AI as the labs building it, then parts ways over the meaning of human limits.

AI Solves Erdős Math Problem: What's Next for AI in Mathematics?

An AI solved an 80-year-old Erdős math problem by walking a path mathematicians had collectively avoided.