HomeThe World We DiscoverThe Prime Number Proof That Borrowed From the Wrong Field

The Prime Number Proof That Borrowed From the Wrong Field

Ben Green and Mehtaab Sawhney proved infinitely many primes fit p² + 4q² by importing Gowers norms from combinatorics - a tool nobody expected would work.

Share
The World We Discover · Explore this series
December 12, 2024
Key Takeaways
  • Green and Sawhney proved infinitely many primes fit p² + 4q², where both p and q are prime.
  • They imported Gowers norms from combinatorics — a tool never before used in prime-counting.
  • The proof works by first establishing results for "rough primes," then converting to actual primes.

Mehtaab Sawhney seems to have a habit of proving things quickly. The Columbia mathematician finished his PhD in four years and has notched more than fifty proofs since starting graduate school.

But his latest result, completed with Ben Green of Oxford, surprised even the mathematicians who posed the original problem.

The pair proved that infinitely many prime numbers can be written in the form p² + 4q², where both p and q are themselves prime.

The conjecture had stood since 2018, when John Friedlander of the University of Toronto and Henryk Iwaniec of Rutgers University proposed it as a natural extension of their earlier work on primes in polynomial forms.

The Problem With Constrained Primes

Prime numbers already resist easy patterns. Requiring a prime to equal the sum of two squared primes - each multiplied by specific coefficients - narrows the field dramatically.

Traditional counting techniques struggle with such tight constraints.

Key figure

infinitely many

prime numbers can be written in the form p² + 4q², where both p and q are themselves prime

Friedlander and Iwaniec had previously shown that infinitely many primes take the form x² + 4y², without requiring x and y to be prime.

Adding that requirement seemed to push the problem beyond reach.

"There are not many results like that out there," noted Joni Teräväinen of the University of Turku.

Borrowing From Combinatorics

Green and Sawhney's approach started with a deliberate loosening. Rather than attacking primes directly, they first proved their result for "rough primes" - numbers that avoid small prime divisors but aren't necessarily prime themselves. This gave them room to maneuver.

The key move was importing Gowers norms, a tool developed by Timothy Gowers at Cambridge for problems in additive combinatorics.

What are Gowers norms?

Gowers norms are mathematical tools that measure how structured or random a set of numbers is. Originally developed for combinatorics – the study of counting and arrangement – they capture subtle patterns that standard techniques miss. Green and Sawhney used them to bridge the gap between approximate results and exact prime theorems.

These norms measure how structured or random a set of numbers appears. Nobody had applied them to this type of prime-counting problem before.

The technique worked. Gowers norms let Green and Sawhney bridge the gap between rough primes and actual primes, converting their approximate result into a precise theorem.

It's terrific. It really surprised me that they did this.

John Friedlander, Canadian Mathematician and Number Theorist

What One Proof Opens

The result does more than settle a single conjecture. It suggests that Gowers norms - developed for entirely different purposes - may crack other problems in prime number theory.

Their paper, posted to arXiv in October 2024, proves the result not just for n = 4 but for any n that equals 0 or 4 modulo 6. The generalization hints at a broader pattern waiting to be explored.

For Sawhney, the collaboration drew on Green's earlier work, which had shaped his own mathematical development. The partnership blended Green's deep expertise with a younger mathematician's willingness to import unfamiliar tools.

The proof joins a short list of results that pin down prime locations under demanding constraints.

What remains unclear is how far these cross-disciplinary methods can travel - whether Gowers norms will prove a one-time solution or a recurring key to problems that seemed locked.


Sources

Fact Check: Claim-by-Claim Verification Verified

The recap closely matches the Green–Sawhney paper and the Quanta/Columbia coverage, with only mild, acceptable simplifications and no substantive misrepresentations.

1 Verified
The article correctly states that Ben Green and Mehtaab Sawhney proved there are infinitely many primes of the form p² + 4q² with p and q both prime, as a special case of their result for n ≡ 0 or 4 mod 6
2 Verified
The description that their proof imports Gowers norms from additive combinatorics, and that they first work with “rough primes” before passing to actual primes, accurately reflects both the paper’s abstract and the Quanta explanation

Commentary

  • The phrase “a tool nobody expected would work” slightly over-dramatizes the novelty of using Gowers norms, but it aligns with Quanta’s portrayal of this as a surprising new application and does not misreport what the researchers or sources claim.

Sources used for verification

Academic/Peer-reviewed:

Other reliable sources:

Share
Related Articles
Riemann Hypothesis, Energy Levels and the Endless Hunt for Zeros

A New Scientist video on the Riemann hypothesis is a fine guide to one of mathematics' deepest puzzles. Here is what lies beyond it: the 2024 breakthrough and the stranger...

Quantum Physics Explained: Where Reality Gets Strange

Quantum physics governs atoms, light, and the technology in your pocket. It is also the most counterintuitive framework in all of science. Here is what we know, what we don't,...

Mathematics: The Language That Describes Reality

Mathematics is the language scientists use to describe reality. From prime numbers to infinity, from fractals to unsolved conjectures, here is what makes mathematics so powerful and so strange.

Endless Numbers, Endless Beauty: About Quanta's Infinity Piece

A stunning article from Quanta Magazine walks you through Cantor's diagonal proof for uncountable sets of infinite numbers - and puts the sizes of infinity in context.