- Riemann's 167-year-old hypothesis predicts hidden order inside prime numbers
- Maynard and Guth proved stray zeros must be rare, beating an 84-year-old bound
- Prime zeros share statistical patterns with quantum energy levels in atomic nuclei
Prime numbers are the atoms of arithmetic. Every whole number breaks down into a unique combination of them. Their distribution looks irregular, even random.
Yet, as the teenage Carl Friedrich Gauss noticed in the late 18th century, the overall density of primes follows a smooth logarithmic curve as numbers grow larger.
Something hides inside that pattern. In 1859, Bernhard Riemann found that the gaps between Gauss's prediction and the actual count of primes are controlled by the zeros of a new mathematical object: his zeta function, defined in the complex plane. All non-trivial zeros, Riemann proposed, lie on a single vertical line, with real part equal to exactly one half.
If true, the apparent randomness of prime numbers is not randomness at all. It is constrained by a deep underlying order. No one has proved it. For 167 years, the Riemann hypothesis has resisted every attempt.
Key figure
10 trillion
Zeros of the Riemann zeta function verified by supercomputer. Every single one lies on the critical line.
A New Scientist video starts from primes themselves and builds toward this conjecture, including an interview with James Maynard, whose recent breakthrough brought the first real progress in decades.
A Mountain, and Ways Around It
The Clay Mathematics Institute counts it among its seven Millennium Prize Problems and offers $1 million for a correct proof. Every serious attempt has failed.
In 2018, the 89-year-old Sir Michael Atiyah, a Fields Medalist and Abel Prize winner who had shaped entire fields from geometry to theoretical physics, announced a proof at the Heidelberg Laureate Forum. Careful review found it did not hold.
James Maynard, a professor at the University of Oxford and Fields Medal recipient in 2022, describes the problem as a massive mountain. He has spent years circling its base.
Together with Larry Guth of MIT, Maynard set a more modest goal. Rather than proving that all zeros lie on the critical line, they asked how many could possibly stray from it.
Their 2024 paper showed that violations of a particularly critical kind must be vanishingly rare, finally beating a bound the British mathematician Albert Ingham had set in 1940 after more than eight decades of resistance. Terence Tao of UCLA called the result remarkable and noted it would cascade into improvements across number theory.
It may reshape how this problem will someday be solved.
James Maynard, University of Oxford
Maynard was precise about its limits: a full proof would still require some big idea from somewhere else.
The tools do not yet exist.
Why zeros off the critical line matter
If a zero of the zeta function lies off the critical line, it introduces an unpredictable correction into the distribution of primes. The further it strays, the larger the disruption. Showing that stray zeros must be rare does not prove they cannot exist, but it constrains how severe any counterexample could possibly be.
When the Riemann Hypothesis Met Quantum Physics
The strangest chapter in this story began not with a proof, but with a conversation over afternoon tea.
In 1972, Hugh Montgomery, a young number theorist at the University of Michigan, stopped at Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study. He had been studying the statistical spacing between consecutive zeros on Riemann's critical line, and wanted to show his result to Atle Selberg, the Norwegian mathematician who was among the sharpest number theorists alive.
Selberg listened, then said the formula looked like something from physics. He told Montgomery to find Freeman Dyson.
Dyson was a theoretical physicist who had spent years modeling the energy levels of atomic nuclei using random matrices. They met at teatime. Montgomery described his spacing pattern. Dyson wrote down the pair-correlation function for eigenvalues of a random Hermitian matrix.
The two expressions were identical.
The connection deepened over the following decades. Around 2000, Jon Keating and Nina Snaith at the University of Bristol used random matrix theory to predict detailed statistical properties of the zeta function that pure number theory had not managed to capture, and their predictions proved accurate.
No Solution In Sight For The Riemann Hypothesis
The Maynard-Guth result belongs to this tradition. Their central tool, harmonic analysis, comes from the physics of waves and signals.
More On Prime Numbers
The Prime Number Proof That Borrowed From the Wrong Field
Ben Green and Mehtaab Sawhney proved infinitely many primes fit p² + 4q² by importing Gowers norms from combinatorics - a tool nobody expected would…
→The New Scientist video presents this lineage without overclaiming. It frames the connection between prime numbers and quantum physics not as a proof waiting to happen, but as a genuine structural parallel between two domains that had seemed entirely remote from one another.
Peter Sarnak, a mathematician at Princeton, has captured the practical situation well. Mathematicians currently have, as he puts it, a screwdriver for problems like this. A proof of the Riemann hypothesis would be a bulldozer.
What Maynard and Guth have built may be something between the two.
Guth, reflecting on what it means to work inside a problem that may take generations to resolve, invoked the Austrian poet Rainer Maria Rilke: live the questions now, and trust that answers may come in time.
For a problem 167 years old and still open, that seems like the right orientation.
Sources
- Primary Source: Prime Numbers Might Not Be Random After All (New Scientist, YouTube)
- Additional Context:
- Sensational Proof Delivers New Insights Into Prime Numbers (Quanta Magazine)
- Sensational Breakthrough Marks Step Toward Revealing Hidden Structure of Prime Numbers (Science/AAAS)
- Large Values of Dirichlet Polynomials, and Zero Density Estimates (Larry Guth & James Maynard, arXiv)
- From Prime Numbers to Nuclear Physics and Beyond (Institute for Advanced Study)
- Remembering the Unstoppable Freeman Dyson (Quanta Magazine)
Fact Check: Claim-by-Claim Verification Verified
All major claims verified across mathematics, history, and biographical details. One minor date corrected (Keating-Snaith work dated to "around 2000" rather than "the 1990s"). Core thesis and all key facts are accurate.
Commentary
- The "10 trillion zeros" figure dates from Gourdon's 2004 computation. More zeros have been verified since, but the article does not claim this is the current record.
- The Montgomery-Dyson teatime story is well-established mathematical lore, though exact dialogue details are anecdotal.
- Calling Rilke "Austrian" is a standard simplification; "Bohemian-Austrian" would be more precise.
Sources used for verification
Academic/Peer-reviewed:
- Large Values of Dirichlet Polynomials, and Zero Density Estimates - arxiv.org
- Random Matrix Theory and the Riemann Zeta Function - bris.ac.uk
Other reliable sources:
- Sensational Proof Delivers New Insights Into Prime Numbers - quantamagazine.org
- Millennium Prize Problems - claymath.org
- From Prime Numbers to Nuclear Physics and Beyond - ias.edu
- Atiyah Riemann Hypothesis Proof: Final Thoughts - aperiodical.com
- Riemann Zeta Function Zeros - mathworld.wolfram.com
- Terence Tao on Guth-Maynard - mathstodon.xyz
Fact-checked by Perplexity Sonar Pro on 2026-04-04
