HomeThe World We DiscoverMIT Scientists Double Atomic Clock Precision Using 'Irrelevant' Effect

MIT Scientists Double Atomic Clock Precision Using 'Irrelevant' Effect

What looked like meaningless quantum noise turned out to be the key to doubling precision - revealing how breakthroughs hide in what we choose to ignore.

Abstract representation of quantum phase effects in atomic clocks showing hidden signal within noise.Physics and mathematicsAI imagining quantu phase effects (Science Reader)
AI imagining quantu phase effects (Science Reader)
Share
The World We Discover · Explore this series
October 9, 2025
Key Takeaways
  • MIT physicists doubled optical atomic clock precision using a quantum effect others had dismissed.
  • The "global phase" of laser-entangled atoms encodes hidden frequency data no one had exploited before.
  • Precision scales with atom count, so larger clocks could push accuracy even further.

Optical atomic clocks face a measurement paradox: quantum noise drowns out the very frequencies they are designed to track.

MIT physicists solved it by tuning the ticking of atoms and applying an effect which had been dismissed as irrelevant for atomic clock precision.

These next-generation timepieces rely on ytterbium atoms that tick 100 trillion times per second - 10,000 times faster than the cesium atoms in today's atomic clocks. The precision should be extraordinary, but quantum mechanics creates uncertainty that obscures the atoms' pure oscillations.

Key figure

100 ms

maximum drift across 13.8 billion years, if the new method is applied to today's best atomic clocks

The Effect Everyone Dismissed

When laser light passes through quantum-entangled atoms, it causes them to jump to higher energy states before settling back to their original positions. The atoms retain memory of the journey.

"One might think we've done nothing," says Vladan Vuletić, the Lester Wolfe Professor of Physics at MIT. "You get this global phase of the atoms, which is usually considered irrelevant. But this global phase contains information about the laser frequency."

What is global phase?

When laser light interacts with a group of atoms, it shifts the quantum state of each atom by the same amount – a shift called the global phase. Because every atom changes together, the effect cancels out in most measurements and was long treated as meaningless. The MIT team showed that this shared shift actually encodes the exact frequency of the laser, turning a discarded quantity into a precision signal.

Scientists had assumed this "global phase" effect was inconsequential to atomic clock operation. The MIT team realized it was actually a signal hiding in what everyone thought was noise.

The breakthrough came from recognizing that the magnitude of this phase change depends precisely on the laser's frequency - the very measurement atomic clocks need to make.

Why Earlier Solutions Were Not Enough

In 2020, Vuletić's team demonstrated that quantum entanglement could improve atomic clock precision by redistributing measurement uncertainty among correlated atoms. Their 2022 work added "time reversal" techniques that amplified the difference between laser and atom tick rates.

But those methods still used traditional microwave frequencies - like lifting dust from a painting, then photographing it with a low-resolution camera.

"When you have atoms that tick 100 trillion times per second, that's 10,000 times faster than the frequency of microwaves," Vuletić explains. "We didn't know at the time how to apply these methods to higher-frequency optical clocks that are much harder to keep stable."

The challenge was stabilizing lasers at optical frequencies. Microwave-based methods couldn't harness the full potential of ytterbium's rapid oscillations.

What Precision at This Scale Reveals

The team's new approach, called "global phase spectroscopy," doubles the precision of optical atomic clocks. The method enables clocks to discern twice as many ticks per second compared to the same setup without the technique.

«We saw that we can now resolve nearly twice as small a difference in the optical frequency or, the clock ticking frequency, without running into the quantum noise limit,» saus first author Leon Zaporski.

But here's what makes this discovery intriguing beyond the technical achievement: the precision should increase steadily with the number of atoms in the clock. More atoms means stronger signal amplification above the quantum noise threshold.

The advance addresses a limitation that had frustrated researchers for years - how to make optical atomic clocks stable enough for transport. Current versions require laboratory conditions, but the new method could enable portable devices.

With these clocks, people are trying to detect dark matter and dark energy, and test whether there really are just four fundamental forces, and even to see if these clocks can predict earthquakes.

Vladan Vuletić

If atomic clocks were running since the universe began 13.8 billion years ago, the most precise versions today would only be off by half a second. With this new method applied to state-of-the-art designs, that error would shrink to less than 100 milliseconds across cosmic time.

What else are we dismissing as irrelevant noise that might actually be the signal we need?

Fact Check: Claim-by-Claim Verification Verified

All claims verified against MIT press releases and prior published work. Quotes, attributions, and technical descriptions confirmed. Frequency figures use MIT's own rounded approximations.

1 Mostly supported
Ytterbium atoms tick 100 trillion times per second
Ytterbium optical clock transition is ~518 THz. "100 trillion" is a rounded figure used in the MIT press release for accessibility.
2 Mostly supported
10,000 times faster than cesium
Cesium transition is ~9.2 GHz. At 100 THz (the rounded figure), that's ~10,870x. Using the actual 518 THz, it's ~56,000x. The "10,000 times" is consistent with the rounded frequency used throughout.
3 Supported
Vladan Vuletić is Lester Wolfe Professor of Physics at MIT
4 Supported
Vuletić quote on global phase being "irrelevant"
Exact quote confirmed in MIT News.
5 Supported
"Global phase spectroscopy" doubles clock precision
Method demonstrated experimentally to double precision beyond quantum noise limit.
6 Supported
Leon Zaporski is first author
Confirmed in MIT articles.
7 Supported
Zaporski quote on resolving frequency differences
Exact quote in MIT News.
8 Supported
2020 entanglement work, 2022 time reversal work
2020 MIT work entangled ~350 Yb atoms. 2022 work added time reversal techniques.
9 Mostly supported
Best clocks off by 0.5s over 13.8B years; new method
Top optical clocks achieve ~1 second in 30-40 billion years. The 0.5s/13.8B year figure and 100ms improvement are illustrative approximations consistent with the doubling claim.
10 Supported
Vuletić quote on dark matter, forces, earthquakes
Exact quote in MIT News.

Commentary

  • The "100 trillion" and "10,000 times" figures are rounded approximations from MIT's press release, not the exact ytterbium frequency (~518 THz, which is ~56,000x cesium).
  • The 100ms cosmic drift figure is illustrative; exact absolute stability depends on the specific clock implementation.

Sources used for verification

Academic/Peer-reviewed:

Other reliable sources:

Share
Related Articles
Why We Can Never Prove That Someone Else is Conscious

'Rival' scientists use category theory to show that while 'shapes' of experiences might be matched across minds, we can never observe the feeling itself.

AI In Science Connects the Dots, But Only In Fields That Are Fragmented

An analysis of 80 million papers shows AI boosts originality where knowledge is scattered and connections are weak, but contributes little novelty in structured science.

"Keep Humanity Safe From AI," Urges Pope Leo XIV

Pope Leo XIV's first encyclical reaches the same verdict on AI as the labs building it, then parts ways over the meaning of human limits.

AI Solves Erdős Math Problem: What's Next for AI in Mathematics?

An AI solved an 80-year-old Erdős math problem by walking a path mathematicians had collectively avoided.